home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: comma.rhein.de!serpens!not-for-mail
- From: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van Elst)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: A3000 SCSI
- Date: 29 Jan 1996 01:04:09 +0100
- Organization: dis-
- Message-ID: <4eh2tp$cob@serpens.rhein.de>
- References: <4crkgh$ct6@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca> <4djffa$bau@rapidnet.com> <4dlre0$jad@news.sdd.hp.com> <4e0amr$nph@rapidnet.com> <4e0jru$16d@news.sdd.hp.com> <4edjsc$49v@rapidnet.com> <4egdq5$grp@news.sdd.hp.com> <4eglri$bbj@serpens.rhein.de> <4egrbq$kas@news.sdd.hp.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: serpens.rhein.de
-
- Jeff Grimmett <jgrimm@sdd.hp.com> writes:
-
- >>Fortunately this isn't the case for the subject of this discussion: A3000 SCSI.
- >Well, so much for YOUR reading comprehension.
-
- Have a look at the Subject line.
-
- >OK, I'll play this juvenile game:
-
- That's what it looks like. You are playing juvenile games.
-
- >Fine. Go make a printer cable work with a SCSI drive.
-
- Might even work. After all there are things like the ZIP drive that
- also uses DB25.
-
- >Without hacking
- >it. Standard 25-pin to 50-pin SCSI cables are the subject at hand.
-
- And if you take a look, these are mostly 25 wire cables (that lack
- the right number of ground lines, don't avoid crosstalk, have the
- wrong impedance, etc...). Some even don't have all the ground pins
- on the 50-pin side connected to a wire.
-
- If you get 50-wire twisted-pair cables with DB25 and 50pin Centronics-style
- connector for $15 then you are pretty lucky.
-
- >Incorrect. As I POSTED, and as you conveeeeeeniently cut out in your
- >reply, the same cable made by the same company with the notable exception
- >of the connector on the host end costs $15.00 for the DB25 version,
- >$60.00 ($66.00 to be precise) for the high-density version.
-
- Have a look wether the DB25 version actually mets SCSI specs if you
- ignore the DB25 connector (that obviously violates SCSI specs).
-
- And yes, you might see higher prices for high density cables. Others
- do not. Good SCSI cables cost between $40 and $60 here. And that's
- independent of high density connectors. And no, neither of these use
- DB25 connectors.
-
- >By your own inexplicable reasoning, then, the A3000 is a non-SCSI machine
- >because it uses that connector.
-
- It does not fully adhere to SCSI specs. Correct. I wouldn't go so far
- to call it non-SCSI because it is still close to the specs.
-
- >It (a) violates SCSI specs and (b) does
- >not work reliably (as quoted from mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van
- >Elst)).
-
- But it does work reliably.
-
- >>>Generally, it does.
- >>It always does.
-
- >Dream on.
-
- That's not a dream. That's _personal_ experience.
-
- >>>For a non-theoretical piece of machinery, it MAY make sense.
- >>It makes perfectly sense for real-word machinery.
-
- >Dream on some more. Go out and buy a few modems and prove it. (laughing)
-
- Weren't we talking about SCSI and the fact that adhering to specs produces
- reliable machines ?
-
- >Of course, only the ones that you personally agree with could be right?
-
- Of course not. But if such a bulletin contradicts personal experiences and
- knowledge I may have reasonable doubts about its validity. You don't ?
-
- >Perhaps you should stay out of this one,
-
- Yes, maybe. It's a long time that I played juvenile games.
-
- >>These have to be handled. But not in the way you suggest.
-
- >I suppose we just close our eyes, and wish all the big nasty problems
- >away?
-
- What for ? We try to understand the problems. People with better knowledge
- than me or you did this before, some of them wrote the SCSI specs, and it
- seems that these people were perfectly right.
-
- >There you go again. The A3000 isn't the physical embodiment of the SCSI
- >Standard and EE theory.
-
- It is close enough to what the SCSI standard describes and of course it
- can be perfectly handled by EE theory.
-
- >To say the A3000 is imperfect is not to say
- >either of the others are.
-
- You misunderstand. The A3000 _is_ imperfect. The theory provides an explanation
- and solutions. These solutions do even work, for me and others. Actually they do
- for all people that I met that had such problems. The technical bulletin you
- are referring to does not provide a reliable solution. If you now insist that
- your method is still right then you simply disagree with facts.
-
- >>_No_ A3000 _requires_ non-standard termination configurations.
-
- >Oh, sure, if you say so. Wonder why that's not convincing my 3000 of
- >anything in particular?
-
- Probably because you lack some knowledge about your A3000.
-
- >>>don't need to dig too much further. While it claims SCSI-II command
- >>>compliance, you can not enable and disable synchronous transfers on a
- >>>drive by drive basis.
- >>
- >>So what ? This is not required by SCSI-II.
-
- >Read again, I'm sure you've missed something at this juncture.
-
- No. I didn't miss anything (but to quote the next sentence of yours). You
- claim that the A3000 isn't SCSI compliant because you cannot enable and
- disable synchronous transfers on a drive-by-drive basis.
-
- This is simply wrong because SCSI doesn't require this. It requires that
- you negotiate synchronous transfers on a drive-by-drive basis (if you
- negotiate at all) and that is done by the A3000.
-
-
- --
- Michael van Elst
-
- Internet: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de
- "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
-